• Home
  • Featured
  • Grab and Gojek drivers report a drop in earnings

Grab and Gojek drivers report a drop in earnings

Grab & Gojek Drivers Say They Earn Less

Private hire drivers in Singapore have expressed concern over a decline in their incomes, citing lower fares on ride-hailing platforms such as Grab and Gojek. Despite Grab’s assertion that the income dip is seasonal, drivers are feeling the impact, leading to growing financial burdens. Meanwhile, drivers on TADA, which operates on a zero-commission model, seem to be unaffected by the income slump. This article delves into the experiences of private hire drivers and explores the factors contributing to the declining incomes.

According to Mr. Lee Chin Chye, a private hire driver, “Competition (among the platforms) has a lot to do with it, the falling demand from passengers also has to do with it.” He points out that his income has decreased by approximately 10% over the past six months, even though he maintains the same number of working hours.

Another driver, who prefers to remain anonymous, mentions the challenges of sustaining a lower income: “I have to cut down on travel, eating at restaurants. The prices (of goods) are all going up but (my income) seems to be going down.” The rising cost of living, including the escalating petrol prices, further exacerbates the situation.

Grab’s Perspective and Expectations:
A representative from Grab emphasizes that driver earnings are closely tied to the balance between supply and demand. The spokesperson states, “Earlier this year, we saw strong demand driven by the festive period – New Year and Lunar New Year… as well as several high-profile concerts which led to higher demand and fares in the industry.” Grab anticipates an increase in passenger demand in the coming months, particularly with the lead-up to major events such as the Formula 1 race.

Competition and Lower Fares:
Drivers express concerns about the intense competition among ride-hailing platforms, with some believing that companies prioritize their interests over the drivers’. A Grab driver remarks, “I believe all these tech companies try to compete with one another, but in doing so, they are putting their interests (above) the drivers’ interests.” Drivers operating on both TADA and Grab platforms also acknowledge that with increased competition, fares tend to drop as passengers search for the lowest prices.

The TADA Advantage:
Drivers on TADA, despite receiving fewer bookings compared to Grab and Gojek, report no change in their incomes. This is attributed to TADA’s zero-commission model, allowing drivers to keep a higher percentage of their fares. However, drivers do not anticipate this model to be a long-term feature, as TADA would need to find alternative revenue streams to sustain it.

Incentives for Market Share:
Ride-hailing firms, in their bid to gain market share, often entice drivers with incentives. However, experienced drivers note that these incentives are often reduced over time. One driver aptly describes the situation: “You can’t expect to charge high fares, if not who wants to take (the ride)? Everyone has TADA, Ryde, Grab, they can search for the lowest prices.”

The decline in private hire drivers’ incomes has become a pressing issue, particularly for drivers with financial responsibilities. Although Grab attributes the income dip to seasonal variations, drivers attribute it to intense competition and falling passenger demand. While drivers on TADA remain unaffected, it remains uncertain how long the zero-commission model can be sustained. As the rivalry between ride-hailing platforms persists, finding a balance that addresses both driver and passenger needs becomes crucial for the industry’s future.

Scroll to Top